The US occupation of Iraq is an open, obvious, unmitigated disaster. The exposure of the torture of Iraqi prisoners by American (and British) troops guarantees that the US will find no more "allies" for any future military plans. The pull back from Falluja shows that the US cannot control the nation they occupy. A historical constant is being repeated in which a nation which "invests" in empire ends up impoverishing itself. The fact that the US is entrenched on this road is equally obvious.

For those of us skeptical of war, there is nothing new in the Iraq fiasco. The government was lying (of course), the true motives were hidden (of course), it has created a disaster (of course), it ended up spreading death and misery (of course), and it was and is enormously costly (of course). All of this could be known in advance by anyone familiar with the concept of Conspiratorial History. It's the same pattern, repeated again and again.

So what about the lies told to the world to convince everyone the Iraq war was necessary? Were lies told to the unsuspecting public before the start of previous wars? Historical Revisionists research the past and recognize the importance of removing the propaganda often generated during wars, from the historical record.

Like the nonexistent babies who never were removed from those Kuwaiti hospital incubators in 1990, the image of which Bush the First used to drive the U.S. into war against Iraq the first time. Like the nonexistent Weapons of Mass Destruction that Saddam never had, the specter of which Bush the Second used to drive the U.S. into war against Iraq the second time. Like the Reichstag building fire that catapulted Hitler to dictator of Germany.

An extremely interesting conference was recently held in Sacramento, CA to discuss the importance of discovering the truth in history. The conference venue was initially cancelled, threatening the cancellation of the conference completely.  but it eventually went ahead, and had to be held in secret for fear of threats from pressure groups who do not want the truth to be told. This in a land of supposed free speech. 

Fortunately the recordings of the conference are available to those interested in the work this group are doing. I can highly recommend the talk by Edgar Steele, ‘Attorney for the Damned’.

International Revisionist Conference

Bilderberg Conference 2004

The Bilderberg Conference  is a little-publicized annual gathering of international elites who define future global strategy.   Other such bodies on this trans-national scale include the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the USA, with its UK sister organization, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (otherwise known simply as Chatham House) and the Trilateral Commission (which itself grew out of Bilderberg meetings and has been essentially a more globalist version of the latter, since it includes Japanese representatives).

'Bilderberg' takes its name from the hotel, belonging to Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, near Arnhem, where, in May 1954 the first meeting took place of what has ever since been called the Bilderberg Group. While the name persisted, its meetings are held at different locations each year. Prince Bernhard himself was chair until 1976 when he was forced to resign because of the Lockheed bribery scandal. The possible significance of this group may be gleaned from the status of its participants: the membership comprises those individuals who would, on most definitions, be regarded as members of the 'ruling class' in Western Europe and North America.  In particular, the conferences brought together important figures in most of the largest international corporations with leading politicians and prominent intellectuals (in both academia and journalism).

Moreover, virtually all the European institutions we take for granted today, or treat as if they 'emerged' as a matter of course, from the ECSC, EEC and Euratom down to the present European Union, were conceived, designed and brought into existence through the agency of the people involved in Bilderberg.

American Free Press have recently announced that Bilderberg 2004 will be held in Italy this year.

Venue: Grand Hotel des Iles Borromees – Stresa: borromees.it.  (It's worth watching the flash intro to see the style and grandeur these elite enjoy.)

Date: Thursday June 3rd to Sunday June 6th 2004

Read more about Bilderberg.org.

What Your PC Knows About You

>For reasons too numerous to cover now (but keep a lookout for a future newsletter where I’ll spill all the beans), I recently had to purchase software which would permanently remove from my trusty, well-traveled laptop any reference to the politically incorrect topics I research in preparation for this newsletter.

>If you’re not aware of it, deleting a file on your computer does not eliminate the file completely, and anyone can retrieve almost anything you’ve ever saved to your computer.  Even if you downloaded something unintentionally and immediately deleted it, the file could still be found and used as evidence against you by corrupt government officials.  In the very near future even storing a copy of this email on your computer could be a crime.  I say this not to scare you (and I certainly hope you won’t choose to leave us because of it!), but simply to inform you about what we could be in for if martial law is ever declared.

One Year After Victory Declared

> Few can forget the imagery of President George W. Bush flying by military jet onto an aircraft carrier off the West Coast and announcing to the assembled troops and television viewing public that the major combat operations in Iraq were finished. That occurred a year ago on May 1, 2003.  However, U.S. troops remain in Iraq and have faced fierce resistance from Iraqi insurgents since that time. Also, at Bush's request, Congress has authorized billions of additional dollars to help fund the efforts in Iraq, and the administration is likely to increase the number of troops stationed there.  But far worse is the little-reported 680 allied fatalities since May 2003 (an average of 1.86 per day), a massive number considering Bush announced a victory 12 months ago.  Some victory indeed.  Source: War Casualties.

A review of Gallup Poll data on Iraq shows that Americans continue to support the war effort, but by a slim margin. The public generally believes that things are not going well for the United States in Iraq and expresses doubt that the Bush administration has a clear plan for handling the situation there. Recent Gallup data suggest a growing public acceptance for an extended and perhaps increased military presence in Iraq. Still, half say it is at least somewhat likely the situation could turn into one similar to what the United States faced in the Vietnam War.

According to the most recent CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, conducted April 16-18, 52% of Americans say the war was worth it. This percentage has dipped below 50% just once (a 49% reading in the Jan. 29-Feb 1. poll), but has been in the 50% range for most of this year. Around the time that Bush announced "mission accomplished," roughly 7 in 10 Americans said the efforts were worth it.  Source: gallup.com

 

That's all folks.

Live Free and Keep Thinking!

Copyright ©2004, ThreeWorldWars.com.

www.ThreeWorldWars.com

Forward this email as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate among your friends and acquaintances, and to post on all Internet sites in full (including this paragraph). Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved.

Online link to this article in HTML format:
http://www.threeworldwars.com/news/07.htm